Since you did not mean it that way, I apologize! I made what I thought was a reasonable presumption from your statement:
That seems to be a trend here, the banning of creationists.
But since there are only two parties involved, the one who bans and the one being banned --- it follows that if the cause is not the one who bans, it must be the one being banned. So does this mean that creationists are less civil?
Could there be a rotten apple in the barrel of creationist posters?
I don't know - but if you believe there is a trend and it's not Jim Robinson or the Admin Mods - then IMHO, the next place to look is in the creationist camp.
Alamo-Girl, I didn't manage to keep up with the discussion regarding posting standards/agreements, since I've been on holiday for a while, but looking back at the thread, you did a fantastic job pulling it all together. Count me in (though I tend to lurk and read much more than post).
Regards
Mike