Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AndrewC
Thank you for your reply!

me: In the vote, the troll-calling provision won in a landslide.

you: Of course, it was already being used by one side. Why would they want to lose a weapon?

The votes just weren't there. The options were: with troll-calling, without troll-calling, either way.

There were more people voting on the Creation/Intelligent Design side for the agreement "either way" than there were for "without troll-calling."

I let both sides know exactly how many votes they would need to kill the agreement or throw it the other way, but the votes never came. The no-troll-calling provision had very few supporters and it failed.

642 posted on 08/17/2003 11:10:16 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 629 | View Replies ]


To: Alamo-Girl
The votes just weren't there.

The votes weren't there to pass another resolution in the U.N. to invade Iraq.

645 posted on 08/17/2003 11:15:30 PM PDT by AndrewC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 642 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson