[AndrewC]

Hopefully, there will be such peace that nobody will see the need for it and thus, it will become obsolete.

The following does not seem conducive to that goal.

Therefore gore3000 is a "non-compliant poster," and he may hereafter be called a provocateur, troll, spammer, or disruptor, and doing so will not be a violation of the agreement.

[goodseedhomeschool (returned)]

This really is confusing and seems quite contradictive in this case. It seems to me that this agreement might be used as a means of eliminating any and all conflicting views of the populus. Is this the way it is or is it me?

[Alamo-Girl]

Thank you for your reply!

Indeed, the above post might seem harsh to one who has not followed the entire conversation.

One of the forum guidelines is that an argument from a previous thread should not be carried over to another thread. But since the subject poster brought bitterness from a thread in the Smokey Backroom - into this thread by his posts 464, 550, 554, 574, 575 - the "willing poster" was justified to end it quickly here in the formal sense by asking that we ignore his posts.

For the severity of the response to make sense, one would need to begin reading the subject thread in the Smokey Backroom starting at post 2288 One would also need to keep in mind the off-forum relationship between the subject poster and one who no longer posts here.

I personally quit trying to communicate with the subject poster at post 2640 when I responded to some frankly, personal accusations.

Truly, the Smokey Backroom issue should not have gotten out of the Smokey Backroom. But since it is here, the solution under the agreement is to not engage a disruptor.