Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AndrewC
And he made a good point, your hypersensitivity is what has gotten you to this point.

Any of us would have said, yep, OK, I'll do better next time. He gave a VERY coherent and succinct argument and then asked you to do better next time.

Not you though, being as hypersensitive as you are right now, you looked upon it as an attack. You looked upon it as abusive.

Well, perhaps you should do better next time.

If Ichneumon took the time to critique one of my posts, I assure you, I would listen and take to heart whatever criticism and lessons he is willing to pass on.

If you find that abusive, it tells me that you are indeed hypersensitive and need to chill out.
510 posted on 08/17/2003 11:58:14 AM PDT by Aric2000 (If the history of science shows us anything, it is that we get nowhere by labeling our ignorance god)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 507 | View Replies ]


To: Aric2000
If you find that abusive,

I said the original line was gratuitous. I find that post 474 was abusive. The fact that you do not understand that 474 is abusive reflects on you, not me. The original gratuitous line If you're going to make an analogy, make sure it's a valid comparison., had his word in it, not mine. He chose the word "comparison" and not "inference". He chose the words in post 474, after I wrote "your turn".

514 posted on 08/17/2003 12:10:45 PM PDT by AndrewC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 510 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson