[BMCDA]

The original complaint was that religious beliefs were hurt in calling God drunk/ belittling. But, reviewing the history, it is clear that the "small d" designer was referred to in the ID context.

But don't forget that:

• The argument from design is not a theological argument, because we aren't necessarily talking about God. But any rebuttal of the design argument is theological, because it requires us to say "God wouldn't do it this way", and this is not legitimate. [16]
  From the Quixotic Message

Regards ;)

[Right Wing Professor]

What a lovely way of having it both ways. That's why when they say I'm insulting or belittling someone when i say the designer must have been drunk or insane, I insist they name the person or entity I'm belittling.

Looking for evidence of God's handiwork is a religious, not a scientific quest.