[Right Wing Professor]

It's not picky. These guys are trying to silence criticism of ID by claiming that negative criticism of the postulated design of the human genome is forbidden.

[PatrickHenry]

It's not picky. These guys are trying to silence criticism of ID by claiming that negative criticism of the postulated design of the human genome is forbidden.

I know. But doing so doesn't involve the agreement. Pointing out design flaws seems a legitimate scientific topic. Dragging the agreement into it is a red herring. ID theory is outside of theology, or so its proponents claim. There is no hint of blasphemy in claiming that the "designer" in ID theory isn't doing quality work.