Replies

You do not have ANYTHING that turns a fish into a dog though.

What? What are you talking about?

Where, oh where, does evolution state that a fish all of a sudden turned into a dog? Just where does it says this?

Oh, I see, since a cow does not give birth to a pig this somehow disproves evolution? Let me put it another way, if a cow gave birth to a pig, naturally, it would DISPROVE evolution.

The statement of a fish turning into a dog, tells me that you have no idea what you are critiquing.

If you are clueless as to what evolution is, then how can you, with any credibility critiuqe it?

You go and figure out what evolution ACTUALLY is, then come back and see us, until then, I don't think that I will even bother responding to any more of your posts, my 7 year old knows more about evolution then you obviously do.

You go and figure out what evolution ACTUALLY is, then come back and see us, until then, I don't think that I will even bother responding to any more of your posts, my 7 year old knows more about evolution then you obviously do.

Where have you documented that Dittojed2 has "earned" this belittling characterization?

The statement of a fish turning into a dog, tells me that you have no idea what you are critiquing.

Actually he is correct. It is you who does not understand the problems (or refuse to acknowledge them). The science of genetics tells us that the progeny will bear the traits of the parents. The science of genetics also tells us that species cannot reproduce with other species. In addition to the above, no one has observed the transformation of one species into another but we daily see millions of examples of the progeny being like the parents. So unless you have some scientifically verifiable evidence contradicting the above evolution has to be false.

BTW - you continue to dishonor your promises by insulting those who in a civil manner are disagreeing with you.

As you can ALL see, AC has decided that he cannot read.

Dittojed said this "You do not have ANYTHING that turns a fish into a dog though."

Therefore he is OBVIOUSLY clueless as to what evolution actually is, because to say that a fish turns into a dog is a creationist strawman used by creationists that are clueless as to what evolution ACTUALLY states.

Again, the hypersensitivity is showing, I advise caution and a good amount of skepticism when reading a post by AndrewC while he is "policing" the agreement, an agreement that he himself has not signed onto.

And why did I say evolution, and not science, because we are discussing a specific theory of science, which is evolution, and I was being VERY specific.

Again, the hypersensitivity is showing, and since ALS is on ignore, and therefore is not able to "police" as he originally intended, his buddies have decided that they will do the job for him.

Sorry guys, but you hypersensitivity and your obvious not reading the context of the post tells me that your motivations are questionable at best.