[StolarStorm]

In order for the earth to be 6000 years old, you would have to invalidate whole branches of knowledge. Are you sure you want to call in question areas of science that have produced real, concrete, and directly observable results? I'm not even talking about geology here.

[DittoJed2]

In order for the earth to be 6000 years old, you would have to invalidate whole branches of knowledge. Are you sure you want to call in question areas of science that have produced real, concrete, and directly observable results? I'm not even talking about geology here.
Yes, I am. These "observable results" make many invalid assumptions. One of them being uniformity. Another biggy is that the geological column is correct. These "branches of knowledge" invalidate themselves in many cases and "scientists" go back to the drawing board to try to come up with a better theory that will explain the impossible. Evolution says in the beginning nothing exploded. And out of nothing, there was molten lava that got rained on for millions-billions of years ( a figure that crawfishes all the time), and whalah- one day, we had man- all by chance, all contrary to the rules of reason. Evolution is a fantasy. It is not science.