[AndrewC]

Absolutely not.

You are. Specifically section 5

5 Language Restraint We will not use obscene or belittling words to describe another complying poster or whatever that poster believes;

I request that you be reminded that calling someone insane or drunk is belittling.

[Right Wing Professor]

I request that you be reminded that calling someone insane or drunk is belittling.

Identify the person I called insane or drunk.

[Right Wing Professor]

'Did so' is not an adequate rebuttal.

I can freely assert that much of the outdoor sculpture on my campus looks like it was designed by either a madman or a drunkard. No one would raise an eyebrow at that; it's harsh but legitimate criticism. So why can't I argue the human genome, if it were designed, looks like it was designed by a madman or drunkard, because large parts of it make no sense at all?

You and Gore3000 are stuck in a trap of you're own making. You can't claim the protection of religion for ID, because according to you it isn't a religion.