[AndrewC]

She was unwilling to look at what was being presented to her.

In the discussion, a scientist's integrity was questioned. I wrote to the scientist and received replies from a representative. The best I can do is to divulge a portion which has a request for those that question the integrity of Dr. Baumgarnder.(not you, RA)

Therefore, please have the individual(s) contact me at jarend@icr.org so that I may interact directly with them rather than having to burden you as the 'go-between'.

[Aric2000]

The man is a fundamentalist, his motivations are suspect, therefore his conclusions are suspect.

Just as they should be, if his conclusion are peer reviewed by fellow scientists, and accepted, then perhaps we will take him seriously, but so far, from what I have read, the man is a crank, and is doing whatever he can to somehow prove the historical autenticity of a worldwide flood, of which so far there has been NO other evidence.

And he works for ICR and has an E-mail address there, why am I NOT surprised?

Nah, he's not prejudiced in his conclusions at all.

Give me a break.