That's not quite how I remember it. One side was discussing science; the other side was waving it away or bashing it (because it changes with the wind, or because it doesn't deal with the supernatural, or because it refuses to recognize God, or because it's too dogmatic, or biased, or the deck is stacked in the peer review process, or because it's an evil worldview, or because it undermines morality, etc.). And then the Hitler stuff was brought out. And then goodbye. Frankly, that wasn't much of a science discussion. But it was remarkably civil, until the end. And it wasn't the science side that dragged it into the mud.
Amazing!!!
PatrickHenry, if there is a debate semi-related to evolution - you will be there doing a silly victory dance.