[balrog666]

If you established that Darwin was really Dr. Moriarty, or Jack-the-Ripper, or a secret communist, or a Nazi-sympathizer, or a pedophile, or the Anti-Christ, or the second coming of Jesus, it would simply have no bearing on the modern Theory of Evolution.

Somehow, you just don't seem to understand how simple and obvious that is.

[DittoJed2]

If you established that Darwin was really Dr. Moriarty, or Jack-the-Ripper, or a secret communist, or a Nazi-sympathizer, or a pedophile, or the Anti-Christ, or the second coming of Jesus, it would simply have no bearing on the modern Theory of Evolution.

Somehow, you just don't seem to understand how simple and obvious that is.

Oh, I understand, alright. It doesn't matter what the source of your information is, if it spouts evolution you'll defend it to the death. You will refuse to consider any debunking information.

The facts are Darwin approached the evidence with an agenda. He had been losing his faith in the Bible for some time, and was delighted to come up with a theory that would help fill the hole. The fact that he approached the evidence in this way has had far reaching impact on how the theory has proceeded; and the bias with which he approached the evidence is rampant today in scientific circles. He read Lyell, liked Lyell explaining away God, and then went about trying to prove it (failing in the process, but I guess that's irrelevant too). Scientists today also like the idea of no God to be accountable to, so they proceed with the madness (also failing in the process, but that too is irrelevant). Other scientists are simply too brainwashed to know the difference between theory and fact and have closed their minds to anything that goes against the dogma.