Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jennyp
The AJC article has a quote which makes things a little clearer:
"Although its hind limbs were not found, we know they were there, based on its hip sockets," Geisler said. "But the hip sockets were no longer connected to the spinal cord, as they are in earlier whales that were land animals."

2,344 posted on 08/23/2003 10:27:57 PM PDT by jennyp (http://crevo.bestmessageboard.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2343 | View Replies ]


To: jennyp
I guess the third article from the Charlotte Observer is just a truncated version of the AJC article.
2,345 posted on 08/23/2003 10:30:28 PM PDT by jennyp (http://crevo.bestmessageboard.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2344 | View Replies ]

To: jennyp
They don't have the proof that whales were land mammals. See where my beef is here? They just quote this stuff as if it were proven fact. I would have a lot less problem with the paragraph if it read ""Although its hind limbs were not found, we BELIEVE they were there, based on its hip sockets," Geisler said. "But the hip sockets were no longer connected to the spinal cord, as WE BELIEVE they WERE in earlier whales that were land animals."

As it reads now, it is very deceptive.
2,371 posted on 08/24/2003 10:25:31 AM PDT by DittoJed2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2344 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson