Replies

TO infers that it is an open forum for all to discuss evolution/creation. AIG does not. I don't believe True Origins does either. It would be like Free Republic saying that it is a free forum for discussing political issues and actively promoting Ralph Nader type politics to the exclusion of everything else. While TO does allow creationist rebuttals and rebuttals to the rebuttals, etc., they also are not a forum without a deep agenda, namely, the promotion of Darwinism. If it were just an evolution website with the same kind of articles addressing various topics like AIG does I would have more respect for it. The True Origins article that I posted, I believe, has some good points to consider concerning that source. Receiving "proofs" from Talk Origins is only mildly irritating. Receiving proofs in the form of 100 links that I will not have time to read is very irritating.

TO infers that it is an open forum for all to discuss evolution/creation. AIG does not. I don't believe True Origins does either.

The TO forum and TO_Archives have somewhat different characters. The forum does feature interactive debate between evos and creos. The Archives are overwhelmingly pro-evolution articles.

I've never really hung around on the forum, so I personally don't know what it's like for a creo to try to post there. What I and many evos use as a resource is the "archives" web site. You obviously won't like the articles it hosts, but I suggest you start answering their content and not the site that hosts them. You've plastered AiG all over this thread, so it's ridiculous for you to criticize evolutionary rebuttals as "biased."

Evos say that apes and we share a common ancestor? True or false?

I didn't see that you got a simple answer. This one would be true.