To: DittoJed2
Does evolution or does it not postulate that man slowly evolved from apes (or an ape-like ancestor which we share with apes). I believe I have seen a ton of drawings like that. What does this have to do with your statement that we evos are saying that some humans have been miscegenating with "part-apes?"
This is yet another clue that you don't have any idea how evolution works. Statements along the lines of "A horse does not [turn into/give birth to] a cat" are another.
To: VadeRetro
Evos say that apes and we share a common ancestor? True or false? Through mutations over time man evolved upward from ape-like to man. At some point a radical enough change occurred that he was fully man (unless you just consider all men part apes). He had to have a mate. Unless a suitable female evolved exactly the same way he did, she still had part ape in her. If she did evolve exactly the way he did, why? Each person's genetics are different. A child can inherit a parent's gene, but to have a husband and wife arriving at that same point of fully human at the exact same time seems a little odd. Of course, having an ape turn, over time and mutation, into a higher form of species, namely man, is a bit odd too.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson