To: DittoJed2
Did you bait someone into doing what they should have done before commenting? Bad girl!
1,939 posted on
08/21/2003 12:53:48 PM PDT by
AndrewC
(The Punch and Judy show --- Judy is not cooperating --- Punch has returned)
To: AndrewC
I read the paper, commented that their results were at variance with the literature, and gave the charitable explanation they were looking at a damaged sample. In fact, they were well aware of the literature, had failed to acknowledge a discrepancy with it, failed to note a major anomaly in their data, and omitted to note that if they used the data before temperature cycling, they got a result identical with those of the 'uniformitarians' they deride. In other words, I assumed incompetence, when a more careful read suggests malice.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson