Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Right Wing Professor
What if their paper proves the other paper wrong. You just assumed it does not.
1,895 posted on 08/21/2003 11:09:11 AM PDT by DittoJed2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1893 | View Replies ]


To: DittoJed2; Right Wing Professor
To: Right Wing Professor

What if their paper proves the other paper wrong. You just assumed it does not.

1,895 posted on 08/21/2003 1:09 PM CDT by DittoJed2

You know, if YOU can't read and understand either paper, why do believe either one at all? Or anything at all?

1,901 posted on 08/21/2003 11:19:45 AM PDT by balrog666 (Ignorance never settles a question. -Benjamin Disraeli)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1895 | View Replies ]

To: DittoJed2
What if their paper proves the other paper wrong. You just assumed it does not.

I'll bet real money it won't even acknowledge the other paper.

Errors in this sort of work tend to go one way; they tend to overestimate the diffusion constant. The reason is, if there are defects or cracks in the crystal, diffusion can proceed rapidly along the cracks or through the defects, and appear anomalously fast. The slowest diffusion will be in a nearly perfect crystal. I can't imagine how you could slow diffusion any further than that, at the same temperature. So, if two groups measure diffusion constants, and one is substantially smaller, I tend to believe the smaller value.

1,903 posted on 08/21/2003 11:21:23 AM PDT by Right Wing Professor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1895 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson