[AndrewC]

At the same time, it was a trollish statement that added NOTHING to the thread but animosity, and it was bait in the water to start a flamewar.

Your words describe PH's and stolarstorm's posts exactly. And they got a response, 34 and 51 come before 56 unless we use either quantum logic or Archaeopteryx logic.

[StolarStorm]

True. I agree my post didn't add any value, and I shouldn't have bothered. It resulted from frustration at having to read the thousandth creationist rant on a thread that wasn't about evolution or creationism. Still wasn't right of me and I apologize.

[Aric2000]

You should know better then that.

It was ALS's frist post int the thread, and he acted EXACTLY as expected.

Again, you are being VERY lawyerly and actually excusing and defending such behavior should be above you.

Perhaps my good impression of you has been unfounded.

Because to continue to defend a known troller, namecaller and starter of flamewars, by saying we deserved it, is a little insane.

Yeah, and she deserved to be raped because she dressed provocatively, that is EXACTLY what you are saying, and using the same logic, you would aks me to excuse a rapist.

Yes, it is an extreme example, but the same logic applies.

Off to do other things, see you this evening.