[Right Wing Professor]

Many of these scientist, such as Crick, offer non-Darwinian theories of evolution.

That doesn't mean he disbelieves in evolution. Crick has been quoted in 1984 as saying Orgel's Second Law is "evolution in cleverer than you are" He has advised people 'for the sake of their soul' to read Dawkins' 'The Blind Watchmaker'. The page is misrepresenting Crick's development of a speculative hypothesis about panspermia as a rejection of evolution.

He's also a committed atheist, who resigned from his college in Oxford to protest their building a chapel.

[DittoJed2]

Uh, yes, I know that. And, if you look at my comments, I said that not all of those folks were creationists. They just doubt Darwin. There are several theories of evolution out there, showing that even in the scientific community Darwin's hypothesis is far from proven. If you destroy the dating system of evolution then you destroy the theory. The web link I sent was people who doubt Darwin and/or agree that his theory of evolution needs to be reevaluated. There are major problems in the theory that even athiestic evolutionary thinkers acknowledge.