Let's look at the scoreboard! In this case, that would be the replies to 1375.
1378. No replies. (OK, I wasn't expecting one here as I promise more to come. Already, though, I'm saying 1375 comprises "deliberate AiG fallacies.")Again, you're looking like the usual creo drive-by-shooter, time and again dumping a bit of AiG (or TrueOrigins, or ICR) onto the thread and running off to get another one without so much as a look over the shoulder to see how the last one is playing in Peoria.1379. No replies. (But this was a joke from Stolar Storm; no reply needed.)
1380. Aric describes the evidences as wrong and discredited. No replies.
1386. RWP attacks the helium argument with a research paper on the topic. No replies.
1409. ThinkPlease links the Meritt FAQ. No replies.
1446. I link How Good Are Those Young-Earth Arguments? and make personal observations on mud deposition, strata folding, and sandstone intrusions. No replies.
1476. Ichneumon responds with a proposal for a detailed autopsy of 1375. This gets several replies, eventually even from you. You seem to be one of the least enthusiastic.