To: <1/1,000,000th%
There was a geologist on the dig as well at Liscomb. And, I don't see where Gangloff was with them. The sculptor may indeed be wrong about even ANY additional unfossilized bones at Liscomb, but it doesn't negate his original discovery.
To: DittoJed2
You beat me, argh!!
Oh well, I'll get ya at 1600!! ;)
1,553 posted on
08/19/2003 9:24:29 PM PDT by
Aric2000
(If the history of science shows us anything, it is that we get nowhere by labeling our ignorance god)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson