[<1/1,000,000th%]

An earlier poster said that dinosaur fossils aren't really necessary to evolutionary theory. There is evidence that dinosaurs are recent (which is what started this post-war), including non-fossilized bones, bones with possible blood cells still in them, and archaeological records which indicate that humans lived with them.

The unfortunate part of this is that outside of creation/ID websites, the authors of the articles tend not to agree with the interpretation given. The specific references you gave just happen to be articles that are too old to appear on the internet, or in the journal archives. I can't find a reference to them in anything published in the last ten years.

I'll give it a go the next time I can get to a library and see what the story was.

[DittoJed2]

A lot of creationists can't get their work published. Some of them, no doubt, aren't the best scientists in the world. But some of them are very good scientists and still have to go to a different forum to be heard.