Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Alamo-Girl
My extrapolation would be that there can only be 1,3,7, or maybe 15 time-like dimensions no matter the number of space-like dimensions. Of course, this is only an algebraic approach and need not be correct. The paper you noted looks at things from a different viewpoint.
1,352 posted on 08/19/2003 10:22:16 AM PDT by Doctor Stochastic (Vegetabilisch = chaotisch is der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1345 | View Replies ]


To: Doctor Stochastic
Thank you so much for your comments!

Indeed, looking back on your previous observations, that is clear to me now. And when Physicist put the stamp of approval on the idea of odd numbered time dimensions so quickly, my first thought was "spin" (in a physics sense.)

The article may settle my curiosity from the physics side, but I am still wondering about the import of Minkowski space in higher dimension brane theory - or more specifically how calculable higher dimensional dynamics would be from a 4D worldview. I don't see how our current methods could "handle" it.

In sum, I still visualize the 4D timeline as a plane when viewed from an extra time dimension, and the full 4D as a block. Still pondering though…

1,359 posted on 08/19/2003 10:33:26 AM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1352 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson