[DittoJed2]

Aric, you see what you want to see. An intelligent designer is a Creator. The mechanism he chose to create with is what is in dispute, not the evidence of a creator. Behe et al may be theistic evolutionists. I never claimed they weren't. But they aren't Darwinists. They believe in an intelligent creator who created what we see, who put everything into place. And, NO, they would not smack me upside the head for saying so.

[Aric2000]

DARWIN was a theistic evolutionist, so PLEASE get a grip!!

Science cannot use god as a causation, because science can ONLY use natural laws to explain natural events and occurences.

You may not like it, it may seem atheistic to you, but to use a causation that is OUTSIDE the laws that you are trying to state is beyond ridiculous. Talk about circular reasoning.

Yes, it's possible because "goddidit", well, sorry, does NOT work in science.

Science uses NATURAL explanations and Laws to explain natural phenomenon, if it used god, it would be religion.

You wish to believe in genesis as literal, please feel free, but excuse science if it cannot use FAITH to come to it's conclusions, it's just a cross that it has to bear.