To: Aric2000
You obviously haven't read an ounce of scientific study by creation scientists. Try starting with Michael Behe and Intelligent design. We can work with you from there. Creationism has PLENTY of evidence, all springing from design. The kind of pompous commentary like what you just spewed shows why it isn't given a wide audience.
Evolution, on the other hand, is a religious faith. It has not been observed, nor is it repeatable. There are evidences, but none beyond dispute. It is a theory taken by faith. Just like Creationism.
To: DittoJed2
Evolution is a 2nd act play - farce ... w / o an act one and three --- clowns !
120 posted on
08/14/2003 10:12:24 PM PDT by
f.Christian
(evolution vs intelligent design ... science3000 ... designeduniverse.com --- * architecture * !)
To: DittoJed2
Michael Behe, and Gould and Eldredge, ALL agree that evolution is the best theory to explain the available evidence, they just believe that evolution had a little help from a designer.
And if you called an ID'r a creationist, they would smack you upside the head.
They claim that they are NOT at all attached to the creationist movement, and yet you claim that they are.
You claim that Behe, Gould, and possibly Eldredge were creationists, they are FAR from it.
They believe that evolution occurred as stated, but with a little help from an "intelligent designer".
Geez, here I am defending IDr's, man, what is this world coming to?
121 posted on
08/14/2003 10:14:14 PM PDT by
Aric2000
(If the history of science shows us anything, it is that we get nowhere by labeling our ignorance god)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson