Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: WhiskeyPapa
As it is, reputable historians like Stephen Oates, James McPherson and David Donald

Donald and Oates are generally reputable but not without error or bias. McPherson is no more reputable than Marx or any other left wing hack job pushing a jacobin agenda as "history."

do not report the story because it is not credible, is at odds with many other statements made by both men

Then cite one statement by Butler or Lincoln then that shows or attests to the president repudiating his colonization beliefs. You cannot do so because no such document exists.

380 posted on 08/29/2003 2:38:49 PM PDT by GOPcapitalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 377 | View Replies ]


To: GOPcapitalist
Then cite one statement by Butler or Lincoln then that shows or attests to the president repudiating his colonization beliefs. You cannot do so because no such document exists. Executive Mansion,

We have this:

Washington, February 18. 1864.

Governor Andrew

Yours of the 12th was received yesterday. If I were to judge from the letter, without any external knowledge, I should suppose that all the colored people South of Washington were struggling to get to Massachusetts; that Massachusetts was anxious to receive and retain the whole of them as permament citizens; and that the United States Government here was interposing and preventing this. But I suppose these are neither really the facts, nor meant to be asserted as true by you. Coming down to what I suppose to be the real facts, you are engaged in trying to raise colored troops for the U. S. and wish to take recruits from Virginia, through Washington, to Massachusetts for that object; and the loyal Governor of Virginia, also trying to raise troops for us, objects to you taking his material away; while we, having to care for all, and being responsible alike to all, have to do as much for him, as we would have to do for you, if he was, by our authority, taking men from Massachusetts to fill up Virginia regiments. No more than this has been intended by me; nor, as I think, by the Secretary of War. There may have been some abuses of this, as a rule, which, if known, should be prevented in future.

If, however, it be really true that Massachusetts wishes to afford a permanent home within her borders, for all, or even a large number of colored persons who will come to her, I shall be only too glad to know it. It would give relief in a very difficult point; and I would not for a moment hinder from going, any person who is free by the terms of the proclamation or any of the acts of Congress.

A. Lincoln

President Lincoln dropped the idea of colonization. He "sloughed it off", as his private secretary wrote in 1864.

Lincoln appears to have made no comments on colonization at all in the last two years of his life.

Walt

381 posted on 08/29/2003 10:25:46 PM PDT by WhiskeyPapa (Virtue is the uncontested prize.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 380 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson