Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: brbethke
And I think we can even leave aside (for the moment) the homosexual issue.

I second that. That's a distraction;

You know what else was a distraction? The whole gay bishop confirmation. While everyone was reeling from that, and after a lot of conservatives left the conference, they voted to allow parishes to develop blessings for same-sex commitments, Then they tried to pretend they were acting out of concern when they voted down writing an actual liturgy for same-sex unions. Now that is just wrong.

The church is not going to bend over backwards to write blessings for *my* sinful behaviors. Just those of our brand new special protected class.

They must be a separate creation. Current "wisdom" is that God was only speaking to heterosexual men and women throughout the whole of history, not to gays and lesbians. Who said that? Lots of people, including the Archbishop of Canterbury.

So don't say the homsexual issue is beside the point. It's the root of the heresy here.

65 posted on 08/10/2003 12:45:39 PM PDT by hellinahandcart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]


To: hellinahandcart
I agree about the root problem. Robinson was just a lightning rod. While everyone was focused on his confirmation and the accompanying brouhaha, the convention completely capitulated on the subject of homosexuality.

That is the real issue. Throughout both the Old and New Testaments, homosexuality is repeatedly denounced as one of the gravest sins. Well, is it? Or is that just a translation error? And if that is just an old idea we can discard, then what other sins are no longer relevant?

Until the church addresses the differences between Scripture and doctrine on this point -- at least, until they address it with more than an elaborate waving of hands and a vague, "The Holy Spirit moved us to erect a bigger tent" -- until that issue is resolved, they remain in serious danger of becoming The Church of Whatever Makes You Feel Good.

Which may draw a large congregation in the U.S., but it is not Christianity.

67 posted on 08/10/2003 1:01:22 PM PDT by brbethke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson