Replies

Their celebrations are premature. This meeting the Archibishop of Canterbury has called may end up handing the ECUSA an ultiamtum: consecrate Robsinson, and you're out of the Anglican Communion.

My guess is that Frank Griswold, head of the ECUSA, is wishing RObinson's nominaiton had been derailed by the harrassment charges.

I don't know. Griswold has shown plenty of willingness thus far to prostrate himself before the hermaphroditic deity of political correctness. I pray that he finds his spine sometime in the near future, but have little hope that it will happen.

I wouldn't be so hopeful about the meeting the Archbishop of Canterbury has called. If you read the announcement he put out about this meeting, the last two sentences read as followed (a quote from the Archbishop):

If the Bible is very clear -- as I think it is -- that a heterosexual indulging in homosexual activity for the sake of variety and gratification is not following the will of God, does that automatically say that that is the only sort of homosexual activity there could ever be?
"My own personal conclusion is that I can see a case for acknowledging faithful same-sex relationships," he added.

I was actually shocked by the total lack of logic in this statement; however, later that day I was reading an article about the MSP convention and one of the "gay bishop's" supporters gave the EXACT line to the reporter.

I believe this is now the theology that they will try to pass off as biblical. The Archbishop, IMHO, is on the side of the homosexuals on this one.

"Their celebrations are premature. This meeting the Archibishop of Canterbury has called may end up handing the ECUSA an ultiamtum: "

Unfortunately, it will not happen this way, the Arch. of Canterbury is a cultural leftist, and he will find a way to side with ECUSA. You watch.