Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: optimistically_conservative; sauropod; Stultis
When you have to read through fifteen paragraphs before you first encounter the word "socialism", it ain't a historical piece, it's a propaganda piece. Cameron McWhirter leaves out WAY too much, and I can only assume that's deliberate. If he knows who Aflaq is, he knows how much Aflaq admired Hitler, and that the Ba'ath party was modeled directly upon the Nazi party.

The party wasn't "hijacked by dictators". It was a plan for dictatorship and repression from the very beginning. How the hell else does he think "the state" could run the entire economy?

I am forced to conclude that...McWhirter probably sends fan letters to Castro, and dreams of dancing with Kim Jong Il (just like Maddie Albright).
8 posted on 08/09/2003 2:10:55 AM PDT by hellinahandcart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: hellinahandcart
When you have to read through fifteen paragraphs before you first encounter the word "socialism", it ain't a historical piece, it's a propaganda piece.

Yes, especially because Ba'athism is not Sweden-style socialism, it's German-style National Socialism, in which the entire economy is meant to be nationalized. It's not short-work-week-high-taxes-high-unemployment socialism, it's dictatorship socialism.

11 posted on 08/09/2003 2:20:38 AM PDT by xm177e2 (Stalinists, Maoists, Ba'athists, Pacifists: Why are they always on the same side?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson