[justshe]

And Mr. tp.....you may have trouble reading an entire thread. If you had, you would have seen my reasoning HERE

To: holdonnow

"When you compromise to promote the conservative agenda, fine. But when you compromise and promote the left's agenda, that's the problem."

com·pro·mise: A settlement of differences in which each side makes concessions.

Let's be honest here. Rush's definition of compromise is just a BIT skewed. He's saying "MY side ONLY gets the benefits!" Posh!

37 posted on 08/07/2003 3:37 PM PDT by justshe

---

In fact.....it isn't a BIT skewed.....it is WAY SKEWED. Mark defined surrender...by the left. He did NOT define 'compromise'.

[tpaine]

Sorry, my gibberish translator is broken. Please rephrase.

-- Or better yet, fergidaboudit.
Mark's words speak for themselves, as do yours.

[holdonnow]

Let me try to help you here. When the president says that he will sign any Medicare/prescription drug bill that hits his desk, exactly how is this compromise, as opposed to surrender? You see, I'm giving the president the benefit of he doubt, that he is, in fact, conservative. If I thought he was a squish on domestic matters, I would agree with you that this isn't surrender at all, but compromise. It is you, by your illogic, who slanders the president with faint praise, not me.