Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: archy
I'd be very surprised if SL-8 magazines weren't interchangeable with those of the XM-8.

My only complaint with the SL-8 (and I'm sure many other civilian shooters shared this gripe) is its butt-ugly stock with that "butthole" pistol grip. If you're asking a buyer to pay out $1500 for a rifle based on a military design, you simply have to do better than that, IMHO. The SL-8's failure on the marketplace was undoubtedly aided by this.

It could have been issued with a proper pistol grip, too. They only would have lost the opportunity to sell it in California and New York, which probably wouldn't amount to all that many sales, anyway, as dedicated buyers in those states have a way of finding what they want elsewhere.

825 posted on 04/18/2004 1:38:53 PM PDT by Long Cut ("Fightin's commenced, Ike, now get to fightin' or get outta the way!"...Wyatt Earp, in Tombstone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 824 | View Replies ]


To: Long Cut
I'd be very surprised if SL-8 magazines weren't interchangeable with those of the XM-8.

They aren't. The SL-8 was intentionally designed to use a single-row feed 10-shot capacity magazine, due to the *Assault Weapons Ban* Accordingly, there've been conversions for pre-ban M16 magazines or for those fose pre-ban synthetic magazines for the Steyr AUG.

But the modular character of the rifle should make it possible to do all sorts of interesting things with the SL-8 once the AWB sunsets in 22 weeks.

827 posted on 04/18/2004 2:35:36 PM PDT by archy (The darkness will come. It will find you,and it will scare you like you've never been scared before.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 825 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson