I don't question her views/feeling of pro-life .. I am sure she is. I just don't agree with the all or nothing
I would call it childish except that because it has the power to dissaude others from participating it is too dangerous to compare to the behavior of children.
The personal attacks back and forth between FReepers are disheartening. I know Jim can't play Daddy to everyone; I don't expect him to. Perhaps he was hoping, as I would, that banning the worst would encourage the lesser of the disruptors - and personal attacks are disrupting - to shape up. I am thoroughly disgusted with the deliberate attempt by you to discredit this PBA ban - and to insinuate through your supposed 'questioning' that Bush and our Republican leadership in House and Senate are deliberate liars. It's Clintonian - a liar accusing an innocent of lying! The influence of FR has always been in seeking the truth, not the spreading of lies. Here in FReeperdom we tear down the lies!
I myself have some disagreements with President Bush's actions, and have posted such, but when he has done well I have praised him gladly. This PBA ban is central to the Bush Agenda - it was a campaign promise and it will be fulfilled in his first term. It is a huge victory for the President, for the pro-life movement, and for the unborn. Why, then, can't you praise it?
You have always maintained that you are pro life. That makes all of this appear even more hateful: you are willing to sacrifice this much-needed pro-life legislation for the sake of scandalizing President Bush and the Republican party, or sabotaging FR, or both. Unbelievable.
Sabertooth, you are engaging in slander, bad enough in it's own right, but you're doing it by subterfuge, which is even more evil.