To: Long Cut
I actually think that the ban, as passed, is a good thing. This procedure should be outlawed;or at least restricted severely.The question is what has been outlawed? If a third-trimester child can still be sliced and diced like steak in a cuisanart inside the womb--and the abortionists simply shift to doing it there--what really has been accomplished?
271 posted on
08/05/2003 6:54:27 PM PDT by
Kevin Curry
(Put Justice Janice Rogers Brown on the Supreme Court--NOW)
To: Kevin Curry; RnMomof7
The question is what has been outlawed? If a third-trimester child can still be sliced and diced like steak in a cuisanart inside the womb--and the abortionists simply shift to doing it there--what really has been accomplished?
Well, assuming that the remaining allowed abortion procedures would appear to require more technical skill, perhaps the abortionist can charge a higher fee for late-term abortions.
To: Kevin Curry
"what really has been accomplished?" One step. In the direction you want.
Believe me, I would LOVE to see that much progress on Second Amendment issues.
That one step, small as it may seem, is a WIN for your side. Take all you can get; the Left will work as if the devil himself was whipping their backs to erase it.
Oh, and you STILL have to get this past the courts...particularly the Supreme one, which has been...unpredictable of late.
To: Kevin Curry
The question is what has been outlawed? If a third-trimester child can still be sliced and diced like steak in a cuisanart inside the womb--and the abortionists simply shift to doing it there--what really has been accomplished?
Naive, septicemic young women in front alley mills?
![](http://members.shaw.ca/victoriausa/SaberCrouch.jpg)
308 posted on
08/05/2003 9:02:16 PM PDT by
Sabertooth
(Dump Davis)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson