[Sloth]

How so?

It is the sense of the Senate that-- (1) the decision of the Supreme Court in Roe v. Wade (410 U.S. 113 (1973)) was appropriate and secures an important constitutional right; and (2) such decision should not be overturned.

How can the GOP Senate act to abridge what they have explicitly called "an important constitutional right"? If they do so, they are liars and hypocrites. Name one instance in which the Republicans have gone back on their word in order to do the *right* thing?

[Luis Gonzalez]

Would you sign that if in trade you would be allowed to save some babies lives?

Or do you think that the bill should have been allowed to die, along with whatever babies could have been saved by it, in the name of "principles"?

[Luis Gonzalez]

"How can the GOP Senate act to abridge what they have explicitly called "an important constitutional right"?"

But that's exactly what they did in this very bill.