Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Uncle Bill
Let's see,
We were promised a ban on partial birth abortions.
This bill bans partial birth abortions.
Therefore we have been betrayed.

Got it.
O2
12 posted on 08/02/2003 11:34:39 PM PDT by omegatoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: omegatoo
Yea, this whole thread has gone over my head too. They wanted a PBA ban, they got a PBA ban, and now they are bitching that Bush didn't ban ALL late term abortions.

Hey, I want abortion banned too, but let's quit moving the goalposts. This would have never passed if it banned something other than PBA.

15 posted on 08/03/2003 12:07:38 AM PDT by TomB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: omegatoo
Uncle Bill figured out a long time ago that most people are idiots, and that they will believe the dealine, and his missinformation without ever bothering to actually think for themselves.

Bill is an anarchist, his goal is to create chaos under any sort of administration.

Bush promised a ban on partial birth abortions, and it has been delivered, yet you see people in here yelling tyhat they will not vote GOP again...I want to see the sort of anti-abortion bill the Dems will pass to please these single-issue voters.
17 posted on 08/03/2003 12:18:59 AM PDT by Luis Gonzalez (Yo soy la Cuba libre.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: omegatoo
Bill, the absolute POS that he is, is trying to divert attention away from a Bush victory.
23 posted on 08/03/2003 12:35:45 AM PDT by Luis Gonzalez (Yo soy la Cuba libre.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: omegatoo
The usual Bush Bashers out on a rant.
94 posted on 08/05/2003 8:10:19 AM PDT by Redleg Duke (Stir the pot...don't let anything settle to the bottom where the lawyers can feed off of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: omegatoo
If Republicans were serious about putting a crimp on abortions, they would remove jurisdiction of the federal courts to hear such cases. The fact that they have not even attempted that shows they are not serious. They speak the right words to get votes. After that, only token efforts are undertaken.
129 posted on 08/05/2003 9:51:39 AM PDT by rcofdayton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: omegatoo
We were promised a ban on partial birth abortions. This bill bans partial birth abortions. Therefore we have been betrayed

From the part I read, it doesn't ban them though..

In what can only be described as the mildest abortion restrictions that one could possibly put into words, Sec.1531 instructs the "doctor" to make sure and kill the child before "in the case of a head-first presentation, the entire fetal head is outside the body of the mother". Or "in the case of breech presentation", make sure the child is killed before "any part of the fetal trunk past the navel is outside the body of the mother". (Actual text of SB S.3 in quotes)
200 posted on 08/05/2003 1:29:15 PM PDT by honeygrl ("If you can't be kind, at least be vague." - Judith Manners)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: omegatoo
No kidding. I guess we should all write President Bush and ask him to veto this bill.
284 posted on 08/05/2003 8:01:03 PM PDT by ShandaLear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: omegatoo
Let's see, We were promised a ban on partial birth abortions. This bill bans partial birth abortions. Therefore we have been betrayed.

With that kind of reasoning in light of the article (unless you didn't even read it) you'll be pulling the "D" lever in no time...

484 posted on 08/05/2003 10:39:11 PM PDT by Axenolith (And you don't want to stand below where the cows roost :))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson