[William Terrell]

Well, that has been my question: is it possible for an abortionist to kill the baby if its body or head is not entirely exposed?

You're saying it can't be done? I'm have a hard time imagining that. Look, in the pictures of newborns I've seen, if the navel is just short of being exposed or the head is partially exposed, I can see about 30 ways to kill it just like that.

Help me out here. I want this bill to work and be effective, and I don't care to "bash" Bush's, or the republicans, efforts toward that goal. I couldn't care less about whatever the "sense of the Senate" is; it has zero meaning in the bill itself. But the definition of the procedure does have meaning and that specific definition will carry a court challenge or drop it without another word from the bill being mentioned.

So, please withdraw the fangs and retract the claws. Help me see where I'm wrong and I will bless you for it. How will this bill stop partial birth abortions?

[Sir Gawain]

You're saying it can't be done? I'm have a hard time imagining that.

I can't find any description of D and X that goes into enough detail to clarify that. Also, D and E, which is done earlier, is most likely not covered by the ban. Let me know if you find an answer to your question.