Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Between the Lines
My appologies for any offence.

Wasn't offended. I just wanted to make sure we are clear.

Most people know what is indecent. I believe that you could even get a majority to agree to what is indecent.

After what I saw from AOL, Symtanec(sp), and who knows what else, I have to disagree. I think you and I are probably close to agreement on what is in certain circumstances, but when bureaucrats get involved, only God knows what will happen.

I don't think the founding fathers ever meant for free speech to be pornigraphic.

True, but I also think the Founding Fathers also know about governmental restraint.

38 posted on 07/31/2003 9:42:42 AM PDT by Dan from Michigan ("This ain't no place for a nervous person." - Mickey Redmond)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]


To: Dan from Michigan
So your main opposition is to bureaucrats and the federal government’s potential abuse of power in this case, and not to decency on the airwaves? If so, I would have to agree. But since moral decency is being passed down to children less and less, and everyone wants their perversion to be legal and out there. Where do we go from here?
40 posted on 07/31/2003 10:13:33 AM PDT by Between the Lines ("What Goes Into the Mind Comes Out in a Life")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson