Skip to comments.
William Bennett considering lawsuits against casinos
The Las Vegas Review-Journal ^
| Tuesday, July 29, 2003
| ROD SMITH
Posted on 07/29/2003 9:32:08 AM PDT by Willie Green
For education and discussion only. Not for commercial use.
Morals czar William Bennett is considering filing lawsuits against Las Vegas casino companies that may have leaked documents detailing his gambling habits.
Bennett, the architect and leading advocate of Nancy Reagan's "Just Say No" anti-drug campaign, was outed in the May issue of The Washington Monthly magazine as a gambler who has wagered -- and lost -- millions over the past decade at Bellagio and Caesars Atlantic City.
During a 60-minute interview with Tim Russert on CNCB this weekend, the former education secretary complained his privacy rights had been "deliberately damaged" while also mocking Las Vegas' latest national marketing campaigns.
"By the way, there's a commercial on that people may have seen about Las Vegas, that 'What happens here stays here.' Well, not in my case. Some people there were trying to do me great harm," Bennett said.
The "What happens here" ad campaign is part of the Las Vegas Convention and Visitors Authority's latest marketing campaign to boost tourism to the city.
He argued the magazine report stemmed from the release of "some documents" by the casinos themselves which was not legal and violated his privacy rights.
He alleges documents were selectively leaked to create a false impression that he had a gaming problem.
While Bennett did not dispute the legitimacy of the documents and said he had no problem with the reporters who have written stories on his gambling, he told Russert the release of the information was not legal and he is looking into the possibility of legal action against the casinos.
On Monday, Bennett declined to comment further on the possibility of legal action against the casino companies.
Spokesmen for Park Place Entertainment Corp. , owner of the Caesars Atlantic City, and MGM Mirage, which operates Bellagio, declined comment.
Industry insiders have said details in The Washington Monthly article suggest the data about Bennett's gambling habits might actually have come from documents produced by Central Credit, a subsidiary of First Data Corp. of Greenwood Village, Colo.
Central Credit, which has denied being a source of the documents, is the gaming industry equivalent of credit reporting agency TRW. It allows member casinos to run credit checks on debts, marker activity and repayment habits of casino customers.
Industry experts and civil liberties attorneys doubt Bennett has a cause of action.
Las Vegas professor and casino gambling expert Bill Thompson said Bennett's privacy rights "were violated. I think he has a beef, but I don't know if he has a legal argument."
Allen Lichtenstein, general counsel for the Nevada chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union, said "It might be good policy, but in the absence of some policy or contract, it does not appear there is a cause of action," he said.
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Politics/Elections; US: Nevada
KEYWORDS: addiction; advertising; billbennett; casino; gambling; lasvegas; lawsuit; loser
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 301-304 next last
To: Willie Green
As the ad does not say, "What happens here does not stay here."
2
posted on
07/29/2003 9:34:38 AM PDT
by
bmwcyle
(Here's to Hillary's book sinking like the Clinton 2000 economy)
To: Willie Green
Industry insiders have said details in The Washington Monthly article suggest the data about Bennett's gambling habits might actually have come from documents produced by Central Credit, a subsidiary of First Data Corp. of Greenwood Village, Colo.
Interesting
3
posted on
07/29/2003 9:35:56 AM PDT
by
lelio
To: Willie Green
Hey Bill, how bout taking a little personal responsibility, eh? What a hypocrite.
4
posted on
07/29/2003 9:37:20 AM PDT
by
dfwgator
To: Willie Green
Las Vegas professor and casino gambling expert Bill Thompson said Bennett's privacy rights "were violated. I think he has a beef, but I don't know if he has a legal argument." Well, it may be a crapshoot, but I think he should go ahead and roll the dice and see what happens.
To: Willie Green
Hey Bill, how bout taking a little personal responsibility, eh? What a hypocrite.
6
posted on
07/29/2003 9:37:28 AM PDT
by
dfwgator
To: bmwcyle
Very smart Bill. Keep this issue alive.
To: Willie Green
hell yes!!!!!!!!!!!!
good way to get back his $8 mil too
8
posted on
07/29/2003 9:38:35 AM PDT
by
Mr. K
(VEY series about everything)
To: Willie Green
Is this how he intends to recoup his gambling and speaking fees' losses?
9
posted on
07/29/2003 9:39:23 AM PDT
by
habs4ever
To: Austin Willard Wright
He needs could hurt them more by stop playing.
10
posted on
07/29/2003 9:39:31 AM PDT
by
bmwcyle
(Here's to Hillary's book sinking like the Clinton 2000 economy)
To: Willie Green
Morals czar William Bennett is considering filing lawsuits against Las Vegas casino companies that may have leaked documents detailing his gambling habits.Phew!...when I read the title I assumed Bennett was going to sue Vegas for his gambling problem!
11
posted on
07/29/2003 9:39:40 AM PDT
by
krb
(the statement on the other side of this tagline is false)
To: Willie Green
Hey Bill, write another book that tells the rest of us how to live our lives. Your 15 minutes is up.
To: dfwgator
I think he did take personal responsibility for his gambling habit, didn't he? This is a different issue, it seems to me.
To: Willie Green
I would do the same ... and if sucessful donate the $$$ to charities. Perhaps gamblers anonymous.
14
posted on
07/29/2003 9:41:09 AM PDT
by
dennisw
(G_d is at war with Amalek for all generations)
To: Willie Green
The "What happens here" ad campaign is part of the Las Vegas Convention and Visitors Authority's latest marketing campaign to boost tourism to the city.
If Bill wants some more money he should just keep on talking about how his info was leaked. All the casinos will eventually pay him millions to just shutup.
15
posted on
07/29/2003 9:41:46 AM PDT
by
lelio
To: DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet
If he wins the suit he is going to demand to be "compted" for an entire week at a casino of his choice.
16
posted on
07/29/2003 9:41:56 AM PDT
by
Bluntpoint
(Not there! Yes, there!)
To: dfwgator
He may be a hypocrite but think about the reason for all of this. Some swarmy democrat scumbag wanted to stick it to a conservative. I'd love to see the worm rooted out.
To: Willie Green
I'll bet you 3 to 1 he loses.
To: Richard Kimball
IMO, he has NO moral argument. Blaming the casino?????
He'd have a case if the whole story was a lie but he had admitted he was there gambling huge sums of money.
I have no problem with him gambling with his own money. He earned it. I have a big probem with him objecting to that fact being made public.
19
posted on
07/29/2003 9:42:51 AM PDT
by
OldFriend
((Dems inhabit a parallel universe))
To: StolarStorm
I'd love to see the worm rooted out. Next month he will be suing a Reno brothel.
20
posted on
07/29/2003 9:43:40 AM PDT
by
Bluntpoint
(Not there! Yes, there!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 301-304 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson