[Clint N. Suhks]

His "message" was that people could fatten themselves off of other people by preaching the Gospel.

Umm...that’s not a message but nice sophistry though.

There is nothing "libertarian" about being critical of scum like Jim Bakker, there is however, a whole lot to be said about people who defend him.

I’m not defending him or his actions, I’m saying his message was true no matter his failures. What is interesting is your objective hate for religion and THAT says a whole lot about you.

[Luis Gonzalez]

Another liar, the forum seems to be overrun by you all lately. I don't hate religion, I hate hypocrites in religion. It is interesting that you can't debate what I said about Jim Bakker without attacking me...are you Jim Bakker?

If a person reads Biblical passages while raping young boys and wearing a Priest's robes, the message is true, and the messenger is scum.

If a person preaches the Gospel while violating the laws of God and committing adultery, he is scum.