[Clint N. Suhks]

Jim Bakker is scum of any nationality...not surprised to see you defending him.

So was there anything wrong with his message or do you Liberaltarians only get off on attacking the imperfect messenger?

[Luis Gonzalez]

His "message" was that people could fatten themselves off of other people by preaching the Gospel.

There is nothing "libertarian" about being critical of scum like Jim Bakker, there is however, a whole lot to be said about people who defend him.

[sakic]

So was there anything wrong with his message or do you Liberaltarians only get off on attacking the imperfect messenger?

Bakker's message was to send him millions of dollars. I see something wrong with that. The fact that you don't isn't surprising.