[george wythe]

I've never given it much thought. Surely the human costs are the same going either way. Lower life expectancy, a succession of partners, greater exposure to AIDS and other STDs, the unconscious feelings of living an empty, lonely life. And so on. Can you suggest some others?

The only problem with your argument is not very well developed.

Just stating that lesbians have a lower life expectancy is not an argument; it is just your opinion which might not reflect the facts.

Similarty, claiming that lesbians have greater exposure to AIDS and other STDs for doing the same thing that straight males do every day in this country stretches credulity.

And the lonely life is just another opinion disguised as fact.

My only objection to female homosexuality is of religious nature; since we probably agree on the religious angle, there is no need to post it.

[Scourge of God]

The only problem with your argument is not very well developed. Just stating that lesbians have a lower life expectancy is not an argument; it is just your opinion which might not reflect the facts.

Just stating that "just stating that lesbians have a lower life expectancy is not an argument; it is just your opinion which might not reflect the facts" does not make your argument. (Forgive me, I can be an ass sometimes. :->)

Similarty, claiming that lesbians have greater exposure to AIDS and other STDs for doing the same thing that straight males do every day in this country stretches credulity.

These are my opinions, they are not facts. However, they are based on common sense. You can't go against nature and just get away with it.

My only objection to female homosexuality is of religious nature; since we probably agree on the religious angle, there is no need to post it.

That's odd to take both sides of an issue. It's great to understand both sides.