[longtermmemmory]

Nonsense, there were more than a few Biology Scientists who refuted the genetic link to homosexuality. In fact my human gentics class found very little likelyhood of a gentic link. (hence knowledge of Xq26) The genetic argument is generally the perview of psychology departments not hard science departments.

Those who refuse to admit the probability that genetics is UNLIKELY to have a link to homsexual behavior are only ignorant in their own right.

It is a recruiting ploy, if change is impossible it is more likely the recruits will stay. Especially if they have no choice. An adult elephant can be held with a string if the conditioning occurs early enough.

[VetsRule]

It's actually Xq28. And we will have to agree to disagree on the validity of the studies. Again, it is particularly telling that even NARTH and "gaytostraight.org" concede the validity of the Bailey-Pillard study, although they take a different lesson from it.

VR