Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: george wythe
Was it Marx who said that religion was an "opiate of the people" designed to allow the leaders to control?

This person has a similar philosophy it seems.

306 posted on 07/29/2003 12:33:25 PM PDT by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 299 | View Replies ]


To: what's up
Karl Marx
Religious distress is at the same time the expression of real distress and the protest against real distress. Religion is the sigh of the oppressed creature, the heart of a heartless world, just as it is the spirit of a spiritless situation. It is the opium of the people.

The abolition of religion as the illusory happiness of the people is required for their real happiness. The demand to give up the illusion about its condition is the demand to give up a condition which needs illusions.

From the above quote, it seems that Marx believed that economic security would make religion irrelevant. (Apparently, there are other major reasons to find religion beyond our economic background, since in rich America religion is common.)

Communist regimes probably twisted Marx's words, because communism never provided economic prosperity; if anything, it created the "need" for more religion among the communist serfs.

329 posted on 07/29/2003 12:56:17 PM PDT by george wythe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 306 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson