How TRICARE Changes When a Military Sponsor When a military member retires from active service and begins drawing retired pay, one chapter in the members life is ended and another begins. If the member has a family, their individual lives change as well, including their TRICARE cost shares. When an active duty sponsor dies, surviving family members remain eligible for TRICARE benefits at the active duty dependent rates for a three-year period. At the end of the three-year period, TRICARE eligibility continues, but at the retiree dependent rates.
*The catastrophic cap is the annual upper limit. It applies only to the allowable charges for covered service. The catastrophic cap applies to the enrollment year for TRICARE Prime enrollees and to the calendar year for TRICARE Extra and Standard user. Use of Military Treatment Facilities (MTFs):
|
|
Benefit Gains Have Turned TRICARE Reformers Toward Smoother Service
February 8, 2001Military leaders and defense health officials locked arms two years ago to rescue a mismanaged and chronically under-funded military health care system, which was hurting morale and perhaps readiness.
The alliance between the Joint Chiefs and TRICARE officials has resulted in successes. For example, it was at least partially responsible for Congress approving last fall the biggest increase in military medical benefits in more than 30 years. The partnership had a bigger role in a recent sharp drop in complaints, from both patients and health care providers, over access to care and claim processing delays.
That alliance, senior defense officials said, is turning its attention now to a $1.4 billion health budget shortfall for the current year, and to reorganizing TRICARE networks and support contracts to reduce hassles for patients and improve efficiency.
Defense officials credit Army Gen. Henry ``Hugh'' Shelton, chairman of the Joint Chiefs, for keeping high-level attention on health care. He shifted the focus there in 1999 after helping to secure impressive military pay and retirement gains from the administration and Congress.
Shelton soon had plenty of company, not only four-star colleagues but military associations, which led the charge for health care reform for years, and a groundswell of individual retirees, angry over broken health care promises.
When Shelton's public and private advocacy for health benefit reform failed to win the support he wanted from the Clinton White House, particularly for disenfranchised elderly retirees, spouses and survivors, Congress took up the cause. Military leaders and TRICARE officials still sound surprised by the richness of benefit gains passed in 2000.
For active duty families, they include an end to co-payments, of $6 and $12 per doctor visit when enrolled in TRICARE Prime, the managed care program. This change will take effect April 28 but, in some regions, co-payments will continue to be collected for additional months. These patients later will be reimbursed for paying the co-pays.
On Oct. 1, TRICARE Prime remote benefits will be extended to the families of 80,000 service members assigned 50 miles or more from the nearest military base. Only service members themselves in remote areas have the fuller health benefit now.
About 1.4 million elderly beneficiaries will become eligible April 1 for the same of pharmacy drug options as younger retirees. On Oct. 1, when TRICARE for Life begins, military beneficiaries enrolled in Medicare Part B, will be able to use TRICARE as a second payer to Medicare. Many elderly will be able, in time, to drop medigap insurance plans.
Given the richness of the new benefits, defense officials sound satisfied that health promises to older retirees are being kept. ``Go out and look at benefits around the world and, I'll tell you what this is a first-class benefit,'' said a senior official.
For almost two years, Defense health officials and representatives of the Joint Staff have worked together on easing irritants under TRICARE for patients and providers through better business practices. Officials announced, at the annual TRICARE conference last month, that the number of TRICARE claims delayed more than 60 days fell sharply, from more than 30,000 in December 1999 to less than 1000 a year later. The number of claims over that are more than 120 days old fell from 1493 in December 1999 to 18 a year later.
The Defense Department this year is required to conduct its second Quadrennial Defense Review, an intense effort to review strategy, determine proper force structure, and argue that enough dollars be earmarked in future budgets. One Defense official said Shelton sparked a kind of ``mini-QDR,'' but for military medicine two years ago. And it continues.
Besides adopting better business practices, Defense officials are moving to fully fund health care budgets, which were chronically under-funded during the Clinton years. The Defense Medical Oversight Committee has the lead.
DMOC was formed in the wake of complaints from the Joint Chiefs about TRICARE. Rudy de Leon, then under secretary of defense for personnel and readiness, believed military leaders needed to understand the true costs of health care while pressing for change. As a result, the service vice chiefs and under secretaries of each service are full participants in DMOC, with one of the vice chiefs serving as co-chair on a rotating basis.
DMOC currently is studying the structure of TRICARE and its regions, weighing organizational alternatives including whether a single contractors should handle all claims processing or all pharmacy networks across regions, so that users see more of a consistency of service and benefits no matter where assigned.
Another big concern is closing a $1.4 billion gap in the medical budget for this fiscal year. DMOC, said one senior official, ``has brought the medical funding issue to life like it's never been before.'' So when debating budgets, the service vice chiefs ``have already got the medical piece locked and cocked in their minds.''
For the DMOC, the Army vice chief is heading up a study on TRICARE organization, the Marine Corps is studying procurement strategy for the system, and the Air Force vice is looking at the strategic business plan.
``Are the contracts set up right within a region. Should we have one contract? Should we have 100,'' asked a Defense official. ``If they were in civilian health care delivery, how would they structure this system We tried to structure it militarily, in the past. That may be totally wrong.''
``About the end of March,'' he added, ``the DMOC is supposed to have some plan for the road ahead.''
Comments and suggestions are welcomed. Write to Military Update, P.O. Box 231111, Centreville, Va. 20120-1111, or send e-mail to: milupdate@aol.com