Don't suppose the line in the article about how the cost of that BILL was ridiculous and not anywhere within reason or budget considerations meant anything to you.
But I did mention that, UCANSEE2.
I pointed that out every time I posted Rumsfeld's quote, that Bush thought the 5 billion dollars a year cost was too high.
I also pointed out once or twice that even though Bush thought the 5 billion dollars cost was too high, he considered the 15 billion dollars to African dictators to be a bargain.
This is silly logic. This is like the wife saying I should be able to buy a ring for $1,000 that can be purchased elsewhere for $100 because we just spent 30,000 on an SUV.
If there are cheaper less expensive ways to provide health care to vets then what is wrong with vetoing the expensive plan ?