Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: exodus
No,no,no! That's not how it works. I'm not taking your word for it. I want you to provide documented evidence of Bush's stated position relative to embryos and existing stem cell lines prior to his election. If you show that then you have proven he is a liar.

Until then, it's all bologna.

371 posted on 07/28/2003 5:53:53 PM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 370 | View Replies ]


To: jwalsh07
exodus - Candidate Bush promised not to support embryonic research. President Bush lied by redefining "embryonic," saying that the existing research was being conducted on embryonic material already dead, so it wasn't really embryonic research.
jwalsh07 - No,no,no! That's not how it works. I'm not taking your word for it. I want you to provide documented evidence of Bush's stated position relative to embryos and existing stem cell lines prior to his election. If you show that then you have proven he is a liar. Until then, it's all bologna.

***************

Bush did not state his opinion on "stem cell lines" before the election, but he did say that he wouldn't support embryonic research with federal money.

When Bush decided as President to allow embryonic research, it made a big stink because candidate Bush had promised not to support embryonic research.

You were there, and apparently you saved the thread, or you wouldn't have posted Bush's speech so fast, where he justified supporting embryonic research by redefining what embryonic research is.

As I said, you were there. Send me a link to the thread and I'll search the page for the link you say I need to support my opinion.

377 posted on 07/28/2003 6:17:19 PM PDT by exodus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 371 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson