Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Notforprophet; carenot
Something that strikes me about this discussion is that you two have a tendency to read more than what carenot and others have posted, and thereby make assumptions about her that may be untrue

Ok what is untrue when a person(carenot) states that she did not vote for Bush.

She had to vote for somebody or not vote at all.

At least I can go to bed with a clear conscience in stating that I voted for Bush in 2000, and not play Clintonian games like you seem to fancy.

256 posted on 07/28/2003 3:35:09 PM PDT by Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 253 | View Replies ]


To: Dane
I don't know what is 'Clintonian' about anything that I have posted. I happen to know carenot fairly well from the RFR chat server, and can say with certainty that she is neither a fraud nor trying to be 'pseudo-coy' as you suggested.

Furthermore I take issue with your suggesting my conscience is not clear, or that I am doing anything 'Clintonian'. Can't people have a discussion here anymore without resorting to jabs and personal insults?

NFP

262 posted on 07/28/2003 3:42:06 PM PDT by Notforprophet (A leg of lamb, a jug of wine, and thou! Alone together, whistling in the darkness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 256 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson