Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: My2Cents
"All I can say is that many of these "paleos" tend to oppose Israel, favor the Arabs, think the Confederacy was a pretty good idea, correspondingly think Abraham Lincoln was a tyrant, and generally oppose a strong US because a strong military requires a strong central government."

So how about someone like myself who supports Israel, favors the Arabs when they act like civilized human beings and favors shooting them when they don't, think the Confederacy was a good idea with the exception of chattel slavery, Lincoln was inarguably a tyrant, and support and advocate an imposition of a worldwide Pax Americana in as kind a fashion as possible and as brutal a fashion as neccesary. Am I tarred with the paleo brush for agreeing with them on a few issues? Or may I continue to identify myself simply as a twenty first century Jeffersonian with delusions of fascism?
78 posted on 07/24/2003 1:13:40 PM PDT by Zippo44 (A liberal is someone too poor to be a capitalist, and too rich to be a communist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]


To: Zippo44
So how about someone like myself who supports Israel, favors the Arabs when they act like civilized human beings and favors shooting them when they don't, think the Confederacy was a good idea with the exception of chattel slavery, Lincoln was inarguably a tyrant, and support and advocate an imposition of a worldwide Pax Americana in as kind a fashion as possible and as brutal a fashion as neccesary. Am I tarred with the paleo brush for agreeing with them on a few issues? Or may I continue to identify myself simply as a twenty first century Jeffersonian with delusions of fascism?

Paleo's would probably call you a neo, and neo's would probably call you a paleo, and neither group would welcome you as one of them. That's why the whole neo/paleo debate is retarded.

84 posted on 07/24/2003 1:17:50 PM PDT by jmc813 (Check out the FR Big Brother 4 thread! http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/943368/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]

To: Zippo44
Your positions are a perfect example of how complex this whole consideration is, and how difficult it is (impossible, really) to stereotype or categorize or label anybody with any degree of accuracy. (Note that I said that "many of these paleos..." subscribe to certain positions, not the whole lot of them.) I agree with 50% of what you've stated. Where does that place me?
88 posted on 07/24/2003 1:19:43 PM PDT by My2Cents ("Well....there you go again.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]

To: Zippo44
think the Confederacy was a good idea with the exception of chattel slavery

In other words, without the raison d'etre of the whole exercise?

117 posted on 07/24/2003 1:40:03 PM PDT by Poohbah (Crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of their women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson