[freeeee]

All I can say is that many of these "paleos" tend to oppose Israel

It has been my observation that desiring a neutral stance towards Israel has been purposely misconstrued by neocons as being anti-Israel.

Of course this leads to the inevitible charge of antisemitism (racism). This isn't a new tactic at all. The Rats have used it for years with affirmative action: If you're against it, surely you must be a racist. Thus the focus is changed from debating the legitimate points of the matter to namecalling and maligning one's opponent.

[My2Cents]

If it were only "neutrality" toward Israel, this could be understood. But some have a decidely non-neutral (positive) position toward Arab states.

[jmc813]

It has been my observation that desiring a neutral stance towards Israel has been purposely misconstrued by neocons as being anti-Israel.

You're not the only one to observe that.

[rmlew]

Neutrality is fine.
The problem is when Paleocons support all Nationalism but Zionism, borrow liberally from Communist and Islamist attacks against Israel, and use the sheild of perported victimhood to protect recycling of anti-Semitic canards.