Hmmm, and back in reply 354 when Grand Old Partisan had asked you for evidence of just one black Confederate POW you went and said that you just had. Oh wait...I forgot...you hadn't specified a black confederate POW held by the UNION. Black confederate POWs held by the British are still black confederate POWs. Son of a gun, got me again didn't you?
Pretty much. And considering that his prisoner status is only incidental to the real issue at hand - the existence of black confederates, which is what Partisan denies - I may further conclude that the entire purpose of your semantics game entails a diversionary ploy away from that issue.